Beyond 861
The article below and its comments called "taxes" was an actual
discussion, yea. That was cool because for effectiveness in one-sided
editorials, I'd reach more people mumbling to myself on the bus. Hey
maybe thats what those people are are ex-bloggers trying something
else. ; )
861 is like a recipe in a diabetic cookbook with a disclaimer
that its for borderline diabetics only and uses some honey and to skip
it if that's not you... the point of the cookbook is cooking without
sugars yet you're telling your friends they can all have cupcakes if
they use honey becuase you found a honey recipe in a no-sugar
cookbook. That's what I think... but as the Founding Fathers ROLL
watching me pay 40% taxes I don't want you to just shrug and say ok.
Come back with that cupcake and tell me if I can have some sugar.
Now I liked the link I pointed to because it also showed the court
rulings for those folks who lost and they seemed consistant with the
writer's opinion in the point that 861 is inside a section of code
dealing with people whose income wasn't earned obviously totally here.
Thats the title of the ..er.. cookbook. But that was a
counterpoint and I'm hoping you can address it like I said. Besides,
Isn't there more to the whole unconstitutional income tax controversy
than 861 anyway? 861 stuff is all I've seen so you'd be making me
read and good stuff like that...


1 Comments:
thought-provoking, mootable pv. just my thoughts, well anyways gl & be chipper is what i say
Post a Comment
<< Home